Subscribe to SIAWI content updates by Email
Home > fundamentalism / shrinking secular space > Denying ISIS’ ideological roots will continue to damage the Muslim (...)

Denying ISIS’ ideological roots will continue to damage the Muslim community

Wednesday 27 April 2016, by siawi3

Source: http://nation.com.pk/blogs/25-Apr-2016/denying-isis-ideological-roots-will-continue-to-damage-the-muslim-community

Between the denialism of ‘nothing to do with Islam’ and the sensationalism of ‘stop Islam’, there are Muslims who are trying to reform Islam today

April 25, 2016, 11:46 pm

Ammar Anwer

ISIS is a serious threat for the entire humanity. The harm that it has caused, and continues unabashedly, is indescribable, unspeakable and extremely horrendous. The most saddening aspect of this aching cruelty is that it has damaged the reputation of the entire Muslim community around the world, the most. Although, it’s extremist tactics have affected the entire human community across the globe, but those Muslims have suffered the most who are peaceful and carry the pain of the entire humanity in their hearts; those who do not hate other fellow humans because of their race, caste and religious beliefs and those who want nothing but the betterment of the whole world.

In the same way, the image of the European Muslims is also greatly hurt whenever ISIS strikes in a horrific way as we witnessed in Paris and Brussels. Due to ISIS, most of the Europeans are getting scared of the Muslim community as a whole and I do not blame them.

I know most of the Muslims living in Europe and in different parts of the world also experience the same grievance whenever any terrorist activity takes place. However, there is no doubt that the Muslims themselves are responsible for the hatred which is now shaping up in the West against them. We the Muslims, as a community have failed to renounce this Islamist ideology on a greater note. The most saddening thing for me is that Muslims constantly live in denial by saying ISIS has nothing to do with Islam. ISIS has everything to do with political Islam. This denial, I believe, is the root cause of all the problems Muslims are facing today.

Why I believe ISIS has a strong connection with Islam is based on the following reasons.

Islam is a religion and Muslims are the people who follow Islam. Islamism is the ideology that promotes the idea of imposing a particular interpretation of Islam over a community. The word “Islamist” was coined by a few members of the Muslim Brotherhood who were put in jails under the regime of Gamal Abdul Nasser. They started saying that only they are Muslims and Gamal Abdul Nasser is a disbeliever. However, this was a tiny section of Muslim Brotherhood, the mainstream Muslim Brotherhood opposed their idea and said no we are the Islamiyun (Islamists) and people like Nasser are Muslimoon (Muslims). A Muslim is someone who believes in Islam and the main principles of Islam. Similarly an Islamist also believes in Islam and its main principles but he also believes that the religion of Islam must be implemented all over the world and that Islam has given us the responsibility to impose it over the different communities whenever we have the chance to do so. Explaining this political Interpretation of Islam Hasan Al Banah (Founder of the Islamist Organization, Muslim Brotherhood) said

"It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its laws on all nations and extend its power to the entire planet".

Unlike normal Muslims, an Islamist is different because he believes he has some political and social responsibilities assigned to him by Islam. Not all Muslims are Islamists but every Islamist believes in Islam (and hence is a Muslim).

The history of Islamism or political Islam can be traced back to Imam Ibn Taymiyyah. Ibn Taymiyyah is considered to be the first person who interpreted Islam in a political manner. In this elucidation, Islam has been presented to us as a deen and not just a mazhab, which means that Islam is not merely a set of rituals but a complete code of life that cannot be separated from the affairs of the state. It says that Islam has assigned some political and social responsibilities to us and it is our prime responsibility to impose Islam in every corner of the world whenever we have the opportunity to do so. This interpretation demands control over the entire world. In the last couple of centuries, this school of thought has come to prominence dominating the intellectual thought process and hence cannot be ignored. Jihad is central to this interpretation and the very purpose of jihad according to this school of thought is to spread the dominance of Islam over the world.

This elucidation of Islam was further expounded thoroughly by Syed Abul Ala Maududi, Syed Qutb and Hassan Al Bannah.

Muslims are in denial when it comes to realising facts regarding radical Islam. They become paranoid if someone tries to highlight the points like I have above. Anyone who tries to say that radicalism has a strong basis in Islam is immediately labeled as an Islamophobe. Instead of realising the facts and the weaknesses that lie within our doctrine, or in our interpretation, Muslims have started playing the blame game. We have been making lame excuses in order to prove that Islam has nothing to do with extremism.

One excuse that the left and the Muslims often come up with is that it is the western intervention in middle east which is responsible for the rise in radicalism. This might be true, but this can’t be the main reason. Otherwise why so many secular bloggers are getting murdered in broad day light in Bangladesh. Why so many Shia and Ahmedi Muslims are getting killed on daily basis in Pakistan?

When did West intervene in Bangladesh or Pakistan?

The Left in West must also realize that this denial has in fact damaged the Muslim community. Muslims themselves have suffered the most due to these Islamists. The attacks like the one in Paris Or Brussels might take place once in a year, which of course must be condemned, but this is the day to day routine of those Muslims who live in such states where Islamists have a free hand.

To say that these Organizations have nothing to do with Islam reflects our ignorance about how the political Islam got materialized in the 20th century by the likes of Hasan Al Banah, Sayyid Qutb and Syed Abul Ala Maududi. These are not small names. These were the most influential scholars of the past century.

Moreover this denial also would discourage those Muslim scholars who are trying to bring up a counter narrative against Islamism (Javed Ahmed Ghamidi,Waheed ud din Khan etc).

Between the denialism of ‘nothing to do with Islam’ and the sensationalism of ‘stop Islam’, there are Muslims who are trying to reform Islam today.

Ammar Anwer is a student with an interest in philosophy, rationalism and politics