Subscribe to SIAWI content updates by Email
Home > Uncategorised > Letter of intent for an inaugural meeting of the International of Workers (...)

Letter of intent for an inaugural meeting of the International of Workers and Peoples

Friday 24 August 2018, by siawi3

Source: https://www.pambazuka.org/global-south/letter-intent-inaugural-meeting-international-workers-and-peoples

Letter of intent for an inaugural meeting of the International of Workers and Peoples

Samir Amin

Aug 23, 2018

In a letter to his comrades, workers, activists and friends, Samir Amin outlines his [last] request to establish a new International of Workers and Peoples.

Dear comrades, Dear activists, Dear workers,

Globalised capitalism, which has entered its decadent phase, is combining a quasi-totalitarian political and economic power with an increasing aggressiveness that is worrisome in bringing about the risk of widespread war. In this paroxysmal crisis, the imperialist countries of the historical West (United States, Western Europe, Japan) do not intend to allow other emerging states to emancipate themselves from the framework imposed by them and to leave the status quo—dominated peripheries. The tension between the West and Russia, China, Iran is not a passing phenomenon but the epicentre of a new violent remodelling of the world for the benefit of the Western bourgeoisie.

Our response as emancipatory movements of the people is not up to the danger. Our struggles are crumbled, fragmented or overly focused on national issues. We have abandoned the goals of global transformation that the World Social Forum presided over and the anti-globalisation movement at its birth. Worse, the very purpose of destroying capitalism is not present even as it is increasingly apparent that this system is leading humanity to ruin. In this context the attack of our enemies was blazing: counterrevolution of the type “regime change” violent or legal in Latin America, political assassinations against the revolution in Tunisia, manipulation of bloodthirsty extremist group in order to put in step Egypt, Syria, Africa, an end without glory of the European Social Forums ....

Experience shows that the fragmentation of the struggles and their exploitation by the system of rivalries on ideological or historical grounds (East-West and North-South) has strongly served the construction of a counter-power to the global scale. The slowing down of the Social Forum process means that they no longer serve as a place to develop a real alternative.

We cannot further this political impotence and we must rebuild an alliance in which we will energise and structure our common forces.

The idea of building a new organisation similar to the International of Workers and Peoples has been in the air for a few years. We need a structured organisation that will set objectives to our struggles and build concrete solidarity between our movements. Workers from every continent will have to be represented in the International so that unity in diversity is our major guideline. The question of popular sovereignty should not be evaded in our reflection on how to build the alliance of solidarities.

It is in this context that we propose a meeting of reflection for the creation of new International Alliance of Workers and Peoples. This meeting could be held in Tunisia, or any other Southern country accessible to delegates from around the world. The meeting will bring together activists representing movements, parties, unions, networks from all continents and regions. The following will be defined as regions: Latin America, Africa, North Africa and the Mediterranean, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Asia, the United States and the Anglo-Saxon world.

Each region should be represented by political figures well known in their region for their anti-capitalist and representative engagement as practitioners of the struggles or mandated by their organisation if possible. It will also be important to represent the voice of communities in conflict with the state in which they live or where no state exists. Unlike past internationals, a region or country may be represented by more than one organisation. Finally, from the first meeting, we want to put forward a long-term strategy of struggle with precise objectives and time delays.

We attach to this letter the in-depth analysis of Samir Amin on the necessity of founding a new International.

Comrades, we appeal to your sense of responsibility and history. This meeting can be the place where a new Socialist Revolution will be elaborated (taking care to draw the balance sheet of the old one) or we will live a world of chaos, barbarism, selfishness and destruction of our Earth.

Sincerely,

Samir Amin

***

It is imperative to reconstruct the International of Workers and Peoples

For the last thirty years the world system has undergone an extreme centralisation of power in all its dimensions, local and international, economic and military, social and cultural.

Some thousand giant corporations and some hundreds of financial institutions that have formed cartels among themselves, have reduced national and globalised production systems to the status of sub-contractors. In this way the financial oligarchies appropriate a growing share of the profits from labour and from companies that have been transformed into rent producers for their exclusive benefit.

Having domesticated the main right-wing and left-wing parties the unions and the organisations of the so-called civil society, these oligarchies now also exercise absolute political power as well as the media that is subordinated to them, creating the necessary disinformation to depoliticise public opinion. The oligarchies have annihilated the traditional practice of multi-partism, replacing it to almost to a one-party system, controlled by capital. Representative democracy having lost all its meaning, has lost its legitimacy.

This late contemporary capitalism, which is a completely closed system, corresponds to the criteria of “totalitarianism”, although care is taken not to name it as such. The totalitarianism is still “soft” but it is always ready to resort to extreme violence as soon as the victims – the majority of workers and peoples – begin to revolt. All changes that are part of this so-called “modernisation” must be seen in light of the foregoing analysis. This is thus the case of major ecological challenges (especially climate change) that capitalism is incapable of resolving (the Paris Agreement of December 2016 was only a smokescreen), as well as scientific progress and technological innovations (including information technology), which are rigorously subjected to the requirements of the financial profit that they can make for the monopolies.

The glorification of competitiveness and the freedom of the market that the subservient media present as guarantees of the freedom and efficiency of civil society are indeed the antithesis of the reality, which is riven by violent conflicts between fractions of the existing oligarchies and is the cause for the destructive effects of their governance.

At the world level, contemporary capitalism always follows the same imperialist logic that was typical as it became globalised from the start (the colonisation of the 19th century was clearly a form of globalisation). Contemporary “globalisation” does not escape this logic: it is nothing else but a new form of imperialist globalisation. This term “globalisation”, so often used without any definition, hides an important fact: the deployment of systematic strategies that have been developed by the historical imperialist powers (United States, Western and Central European countries, Japan, which I shall call “the Triad”) that continue to pillage the resources of the global South and the super-exploitation of its labour that is associated with delocalisation and subcontracting.

These powers intend to maintain their “historical privilege” and to prevent all the other nations from extricating themselves from the status of dominated peripheries. The history of the last century was in fact that of the revolt of the peoples of the peripheries of the world system who were engaged in a socialist de-linking or in attenuated forms of national liberation, whose page has, for the moment, been turned. The re-colonisation now under way, which has no legitimacy, is therefore fragile.

For this reason the historical imperialist powers of the Triad have set up a system of collective military control over the planet, directed by the United States. Membership of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, which is inextricably linked to the construction of Europe, as also the militarisation of Japan, reflects the requirement of this new collective imperialism, which has taken over the national imperialisms (of the United States, Great Britain, Japan, Germany, France and a few others), which were formerly in permanent and violent conflict.

In these conditions, constructing an international front of workers and the peoples of the whole world has to be the main objective of the struggle to meet the challenge of counteracting the spreading of contemporary imperialist capitalism.

Confronted by this tremendous challenge, the inadequacy of the struggles being carried out by the victims of the system is all too apparent. Their weaknesses are of different kinds, which I would classify under the following headings:

i) The extreme fragmentation of the struggles, whether at the local or world level, which are always specific and conducted in particular places and subject-matters (ecology, women’s rights, social services, community demands, etc.) The rare campaigns conducted at the national or even world level have not had any significant success in that they have not forced any changes of the policies being carried out by those in power. Many of these struggles have been absorbed by the system and foster the illusion that it is possible to reform it.

Nevertheless, there has been an enormous acceleration in the process of generalised proletarianisation. Almost all the populations in the central capitalist countries are now subjected to the status of waged workers selling their labour. The industrialisation of regions in the global South has created worker proletariats and salaried middle classes while their peasantries are now fully integrated into the market system. But the political strategies employed by the powerful have succeeded in fragmenting this gigantic proletariat into diverse fractions that are often in conflict with each other. This contradiction must be overcome.

ii) The peoples of the Triad (United States of America, Western and Central Europe, Japan) have renounced international anti-imperialist solidarity, which has been replaced at best by “humanitarian” campaigns and “aid” programmes that are controlled by the capital of the monopolies. The European political forces that inherited left-wing traditions thus now support the imperialist vision of existing globalisation.

iii) A new right-wing ideology has gained support among the people.

In the North, the central theme of anti-capitalist class struggle has been abandoned, or reduced to a greatly incomplete expression – for the benefit of a so-called new definition of the left-wing “partner culture” or communitarianism, separating the defence of specific rights from the general fight against capitalism.

In certain countries of the South, the tradition of struggles that associated the anti-imperialist struggle with social progress has given way to reactionary backward-looking illusions expressed by religions or pseudo ethics. In other countries of the South, the successful acceleration of economic growth over the last decades feeds the illusion that it is possible to construct a “developed” national capitalism capable of imposing its active participation in shaping globalisation.

The power of the oligarchies of contemporary imperialism seems to be indestructible, in the countries of the Triad and even at the world level (“the end of history”!). Public opinion subscribes to its disguise as “market democracy”, preferring it to its past adversary – socialism – which is invariably embellished by such odious sobriquets as criminal, nationalist or totalitarian autocracies.

However this system is not viable for many reasons:

i) Contemporary capitalism is presented as being “open” to criticism and reform, as innovative and flexible. Some voices claim to put an end to the abuses of its uncontrolled finance and the permanent austerity policies that accompany it – and thus “save capitalism”. But such calls will remain in vain as present practices serve the interests of the oligarchs of the Triad – the only ones that count – as they guarantee the continual increase of wealth in spite of the economic stagnation that besets their countries.

ii) The European sub-system is an integral part of imperial globalisation. It was conceived in a reactionary spirit that was anti-socialist and pro-imperialist, subordinate to the military command of the United States. Within it, Germany exercises its hegemony, particularly in the framework of the euro zone and over Eastern Europe, which has been annexed just as Latin America has been annexed by the United States. “German Europe” serves the nationalist interests of the German oligarchy, which are expressed with arrogance, as we saw in the Greek crisis. This Europe is not viable and its implosion has already started.

iii) The stagnation of growth in the countries of the Triad contrasts with the acceleration in growth of regions in the South, which have been able to profit from globalisation. It has been concluded too hastily that capitalism is alive and well, even if its centre of gravity is moving from the old countries of Atlantic West to the South, particularly Asia. In actual fact the obstacles to pursuing this historical corrective movement are likely to become increasingly violent, including military aggression. The imperial powers do not intend to allow any country of the periphery – great or small – to free themselves from domination.

iv) The ecological devastation that is necessarily associated with capitalist expansion is reinforcing the reasons why this system is not viable.

We are now in the phase of the “autumn of capitalism” without this being strengthened by the emergence of “the people’s spring” and a socialist perspective. The possibility of substantial progressive reforms of capitalism in its current stage is only an illusion. There is no alternative other than that enabled by a renewal of the international radical left, capable of carrying out – and not just imagining – socialist advances. It is necessary to end crisis-ridden capitalism rather than try to end the crisis of capitalism.

Based on a first hypothesis, nothing decisive will affect the attachment of the peoples of the Triad to their imperialist option, especially in Europe. The victims of the system will remain incapable of conceiving their way out of the paths that have been traced by the “European project” which has to be deconstructed before it can then be reconstructed with another vision. The experiences of Syriza, Podemos and France Insoumise, the hesitations of Die Linke and others testify to the extent and complexity of the challenge. The facile accusation of “nationalism” of those critical of Europe does not hold water. The European project is increasingly visible as being that of the bourgeois nationalism of Germany.

There is no alternative in Europe, as elsewhere, to the setting up of national, popular and democratic projects (not bourgeois, indeed anti-bourgeois) that will begin the delinking from imperialist globalisation. It is necessary to deconstruct the extreme centralisation of wealth and the power that is associated with the system.

According to this hypothesis, the most probable outcome will be a remake of the 20th century: advances made exclusively in some of the peripheries of the system. But these advances will remain fragile, as have those of the past, and for the same reason – the permanent warfare waged against them by the imperialist power centres, the success of which is greatly due to their own limits and deviations.

Whereas the hypothesis of a worker and people’s internationalism opens up the way to further evolutions that are necessary and possible.

The first of these ways is that of the “decadence of civilisation”. In that case, these evolutions are not to be masterminded by anyone, their trail must be blazed only by the needs created by the situation. However, in our epoch, given the power of ecological and military destruction and the disposition of the powerful to use it, the risk, denounced by Marx in his time, that there is a very real risk that the fighting will destroy all the camps that oppose each other. The second path, by contrast, will require the lucid and organised intervention of the international front of the workers and the peoples.

Creating a new Internationale of Workers and Peoples must be the main objective for the genuine militants who are convinced of the odious nature of the world imperialist capitalist system that we have at present. It is a heavy responsibility and the task requires several years before giving any tangible results. As for myself, I put forward the following proposals:

i) The aim should be to establish an Organisation (the new Internationale) and not just a “movement”. This involves moving beyond the concept of a discussion forum. It also involves analysing the inadequacies of the notion, still prevalent, that the “movements” claim to be horizontal and are hostile to so-called vertical organisations on the pretext that the latter are by their very nature anti-democratic: that the organisation is, in fact, the result of action which by itself generates “leaders”. The latter can aspire to dominate, even manipulate the movements. But it is also possible to avoid this danger through appropriate statutes. This should be discussed.

ii) The experience of the worker Internationales should be seriously studied, even if they belong to the past. This should be done, not in order to “choose” a model among them, but to invent the most suitable form for contemporary conditions.

iii) Such an invitation should be addressed to a good number of combative parties and organisations. A committee should first be set up to get the project started.

* Professor Samir Amin was founder of the Third World Forum.