The Laboratory of Scientific Racism: India and the Origins of Anthropology

Source: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-024344?download=true&journalCode=anthro

Home Annual Review of Anthropology Volume 51, 2022 Weaver

The Laboratory of Scientific Racism: India and the Origins of Anthropology

Annual Review of Anthropology

Vol. 51:- (Volume publication date October 2022)
Review in Advance first posted online on June 1, 2022. (Changes may still occur before final publication.)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-024344

Lesley Jo Weaver

Department of Global Studies, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.

Abstract

Anthropology, especially biological anthropology, owes its origins to the scientific study of human racial differences. That dark history is well-acknowledged and, when it is taught, usually begins with the racism of early figures, such as Johann Friedrich Blumenbach or, more recently, Ernest Hooton, and exonerates itself through a turn toward antiracist scholars such as Frank Livingstone and Franz Boas. Rarely, if ever, is this origin story critically appraised. This article aims to complicate the origin story of biological anthropology by examining how colonial subjects were involved in the development, testing, and refinement of racial theory, and thus of biological anthropology itself. Taking India as an example, I trace how Indians and the caste system were first the subjects and eventually the interlocutors of racial scientific theory and testing. This reorientation, I argue, is important for developing a more expansive and accurate version of the discipline’s history and also for shining a light on its relevance to contemporary global racial conflict.

Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Anthropology Volume 51 is October 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.